Browse Bar: Browse by Author | Browse by Category | Browse by Citation | Advanced Search
Author(s): Carpenter, G.A. |
Year: 1997
Citation: In D.S. Levine & W.R. Elsberry (Eds.), Optimality in Biological and Artificial Networks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 288-316.
Abstract: It is a neural network truth universally acknowledged, that the signal transmitted to a target node must be equal to the product of the path signal times a weight. Analysis of catastrophic forgetting by distributed codes leads to the unexpected conclusion that this universal synaptic transmission rule may not be optimal in certain neural networks. The distributed outstar, a network designed to support stable codes with fast or slow learning, generalizes the outstar network for spatial pattern learning. IN the outstar, signals for a source node cause weights to learn and recall arbitrary patterns across a target field of nodes. The distributed outstar replaces the outstar source node with a source field, of arbitrarily many nodes, where the activity pattern may be arbitrarily distributed or compressed. Learning proceeds according to a principle of atrophy due to disuse whereby a path weight decreases in joint proportion to the transmitted path signal and the degree of disuse of the activity level. Weight changes at a node are apportioned according to the distributed pattern of converging signals. Three types of synaptic transmission, a product rule, a capacity rule, and a threshold rule, are examined for this system. The three rules are computationally equivalent when source field activity is maximally compressed, or winner-take-all. When source field activity is distributed, catastrophic forgetting may occur. Only the threshold rule solves this problem. Analysis of spatial pattern learning by distributed codes thereby leads to the conjecture that the optimal unit of long-tern memory in such a system is a subtractive threshold, rather than a multiplicative weight.
Topics:
Biological Learning,
